When do I need a headless browser vs simple HTTP requests?

Headless browsers are powerful but slow and expensive. Use them only when necessary.

Simple HTTP requests (Requests/Axios):

When to use:

  • Static HTML sites
  • Server-side rendered content
  • Public APIs
  • Pages where all content is in initial HTML response
  • Cost and speed are priorities

Advantages:

  • 10-100x faster than headless browsers
  • Much lower resource usage
  • Simpler code and debugging
  • Lower bandwidth costs
  • Easier to scale

Headless browsers (Puppeteer/Playwright/Selenium):

When to use:

  • JavaScript-rendered content (SPAs built with React, Vue, Angular)
  • Content loaded after page load (infinite scroll, lazy loading)
  • Sites requiring user interaction (clicking, scrolling, form submission)
  • Sites with aggressive bot detection
  • Need to take screenshots or generate PDFs

Disadvantages:

  • 10-100x slower
  • High memory and CPU usage
  • More complex setup and maintenance
  • Higher bandwidth costs (loads all assets)
  • Harder to debug

How to decide:

Step 1: Check if content is in initial HTML

  • View page source (right-click → View Page Source)
  • If you see your target data: Use HTTP requests
  • If you see <div id="root"></div> or empty containers: Might need headless

Step 2: Check network requests

  • Open DevTools → Network tab
  • Look for API endpoints returning JSON
  • If data comes from APIs: Scrape the API directly (fastest option)

Step 3: Test with simple requests first

  • Always try HTTP requests before assuming you need a browser
  • Many "dynamic" sites actually have server-side rendering

Hybrid approach:

Some scrapers use both:

  • HTTP requests for product listing pages (fast)
  • Headless browser for detail pages with dynamic reviews (when needed)

Cost comparison:

Scraping 10,000 pages:

  • HTTP requests: $5-20 (mostly proxy costs)
  • Headless browser: $50-200 (10x bandwidth + compute costs)

Recommendation:

Start with simple HTTP requests. Only use headless browsers after confirming:

  1. Content is truly JavaScript-rendered
  2. No API endpoint is available
  3. The added cost and complexity is justified

Related Questions